Instead of asking for examples, defending the accusation you try and turn the argument so I am on defense.
It was an emotional response. Therefore, I am still on offense and you have yet to defend the claim.
Liberal ideals are based on "bleeding heart" empathy. Eliminate poverty, eliminate war yadda yadda yadda. Both of these are impossible as there will always be some who figure out how to make more money and some who cant and therefore make less. Even if you redistribute the funds some will be content with the minimum or have no intelligence to figure out how to make the most. With war, there will always be someone who wants to control others. You can submit or you can fight. To imply there is such a thing as "World Peace" is to be ignorant of the desire for power or to be content with giving in. Emotionally, you will argue, logically you would agree. There are even liberals who wish us to forget Pearl Harbor. http://www.commondreams.org/views06/1207-20.htm Lastly, I'm not talking about all liberals. Some actually have a degree of common sense. Even Slick Willy saw the folly of his liberal predecessors versions of Welfare and reformed it. (one of his few good deeds). The problem is, most liberals on this board are exactly the types whose ideology I do despise. The reasons, I have hopefully made clear enough to you. If not, I admit, I have never been great with children.