+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2006

    Default How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?

    How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?
    More Than You Think ... and Maybe Than You Want to Know!
    by www.SixWise.com

    How about a little rat hair with your peanut butter? A fly head with your macaroni and cheese? Though it may sound disgusting, these things and other gross filth the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) calls "natural contaminants" are indeed allowed and present in your food.

    In fact, so common are these contaminants that the FDA has published a booklet detailing the so-called "Food Defect Action Levels," which were needed, according to the FDA, " ... because it is economically impractical to grow, harvest, or process raw products that are totally free of non-hazardous, naturally occurring, unavoidable defects."

    Surely, anyone who's ever collected lettuce from a home garden, picked apples right from the tree or strawberries right from the vine has gotten the unpleasant surprise of finding a spider, worm or other "natural contaminant" in their harvest. But in these cases, we're more accepting, or at least, more expecting, of finding an unwanted guest, and we're free to inspect each item for ourselves.

    But what about when it comes to processed foods? Is there really any way to know how many insect parts have been ground right up with the rest of the ingredients? Probably not.

    Think insect parts and rodent hairs are more of a rarity? Think again. A University of Ohio fact sheet estimates that we eat from one to two pounds of insects each year, and without knowing it.

    This is Gross, but is it Dangerous?

    Quite the contrary. "They're actually pretty healthy," says Dr. Philip Nixon, an entomologist at the University of Illinois, in regard to insects, "If we were more willing to accept certain defect levels such as insects and insect parts, growers could reduce pesticide usage. Some of the spraying that goes on is directly related to the aesthetics of our food."

    The FDA agrees that it's reasonable to accept more natural defects in our food in lieu of increasing the amount of pesticides sprayed on them:

    "The alternative to establishing natural defect levels in some foods would be to insist on increased utilization of chemical substances to control insects, rodents and other natural contaminants. The alternative is not satisfactory because of the very real danger of exposing consumers to potential hazards from residues of these chemicals, as opposed to the aesthetically unpleasant but harmless natural and unavoidable defects."

    However, there may be one health area that's been overlooked. According to Judy Tidwell, an economic service specialist at a state social services office in the Southeast United States who has struggled with allergies, trace amounts of insect parts that have been ground into food items ranging from strawberry jam to spaghetti sauce can affect people with allergies and asthma.

    "We throw away the products that we see are infested. Just think how many we consume because we didn't notice they were infested. Ingesting insect material may cause stomach disorders, as well as allergic reactions," she says.

    How Many Rodent Hairs and Insect Parts Are In ...

    Here is a very brief sampling of the FDA's Food Defect Action Level list. They begin investigation when foods reach the action level they've set. According to the FDA, typical foods contain about 10 percent of the action level, but others say they contain more like 40 percent.


    Insect filth: Average is 60 or more insect fragments per 100 grams when 6 100-gram subsamples are examined OR any 1 subsample contains 90 or more insect fragments

    Rodent filth: Average is 1 or more rodent hairs per 100 grams in 6 100-gram subsamples examined OR any 1 subsample contains 3 or more rodent hairs


    Insects and insect eggs: 5 or more Drosophila and other fly eggs per 250 ml or 1 or more maggots per 250 ml


    Parasites: 3% of the fillets examined contain 1 or more parasites accompanied by pus pockets


    Insect filth: Average of 225 insect fragments or more per 225 grams in 6 or more subsamples

    Rodent filth: Average of 4.5 rodent hairs or more per 225 grams in 6 or more subsamples


    Insect filth: Average of 30 or more insect fragments per 100 grams

    Rodent filth: Average of 1 or more rodent hairs per 100 grams


    Rodent filth: 1 or more rodent excreta pellets are found in 1 or more subsamples, and 1 or more rodent hairs are found in 2 or more other subsamples OR 2 or more rodent hairs per pound and rodent hair is found in 50% or more of the subsamples OR 20 or more gnawed grains per pound and rodent hair is found in 50% or more of the subsamples


    Insect filth: Average of 75 or more insect fragments per 50 grams

    Rodent filth: Average of 1 or more rodent hairs per 50 grams

    Can these things be avoided? To avoid all unsavory food components, it seems, would be to stop eating all together. And perhaps we're just being too squeamish. After all, as Dr. Manfred Kroger, a professor of food science at Pennsylvania State University, says, "Let's face it, much of our food comes from nature, and nature is not perfect."

    Recommended Reading

    Why are More Boys than Girls Being Born?

    Those Who Don't Diet are Better at Improving Health Than Those Who Do Diet



    U.S. FDA: Food Defect Action Levels

    News-Leader.com: Brace Yourself: There's Filth in the Food You Eat

    Please Don't Eat the Aphids!

  2. #2
    Filthy mud blood GBA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005

    Default Re: How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?

    Drink urine!
    Allah proclaims it !


    June 13, 2007 No.363

    Media Uproar Following Egyptian Mufti's Fatwa on Companions of the Prophet Muhammad Being Blessed by Drinking His Urine
    By: L. Azuri

    An uproar in the Egyptian media followed the recent publication of a book by Egyptian Mufti Dr. Ali Gum'a in which he claimed that the companions of the Prophet Muhammad would drink his urine to be blessed.

    The fatwa provoked strong objections on the part of the Egyptian religious establishment. Leading Al-Azhar and Religious Endowments Ministry officials stated that Gum'a's conclusions were mistaken even though they were based on Islamic sources. They added that his claims were inappropriate for the modern era and that they only caused embarrassment in the Egyptian street and did damage to the Prophet and to Islam.

    There was an outcry against the fatwa from the Egyptian public, and a complaint was filed against Gum'a demanding that he stand trial for harming Islam, the Prophet, and the Companions of the Prophet. Columnists in the Egyptian papers ridiculed the fatwa and protested against it: While some argued that there was no point in raising such issues from the past that had nothing to do with public life today, others stated that the fatwa was for Islamic scholars, not for the masses, and still others said that it was a tool for those who sought to harm Islam. Some also called on Gum'a to resign from his post as the Mufti of Egypt.

    While according to some reports Gum'a had apologized for the fatwa, in actuality he clarified that he had not apologized, but had only decided to remove the book from the market and to refrain from appearing in the media until the uproar subsided.

    The following are a summary of the fatwa and excerpts from responses to it in the Egyptian press:
    Egyptian Mufti: The Companions of the Prophet Blessed Themselves with His Urine, Sweat and Saliva

    In his book Religion and Life - Modern Everyday Fatwas, Egyptian Mufti Dr. Ali Gum'a wrote that the companions of the Prophet Muhammad would bless themselves by drinking his urine, and described an incident of urine-drinking from a hadith: "Umm Ayman drank the urine of the Prophet, and the prophet told her: 'This stomach will not be dragged through the fire of Hell, because it contains something of our Lord the Messenger of Allah...' [1]

    "This blessing," Al-Gum'a added, "[can also] be done with the honorable saliva, sweat, hair, urine or blood of the Prophet. This is because anyone who knows the love of the Messenger of Allah is not repulsed [by these]; just as a mother is not repulsed by the feces of her son, this is even more so [in the case of] our Lord the Messenger of Allah, whom we love more than our fathers, sons, and wives. Anyone who was or is repulsed by the Messenger of Allah must recant his faith." [2]

    Following the ensuing uproar, Gum'a came to the defense of his fatwa, saying: "The entire body of the Prophet, whether exposed or hidden, is pure, and there is nothing in it- including his secretions - that [can] repulse anyone. His sweat smelled better than perfume. Umm Haram would collect this sweat and distribute it to the people of Al-Madina." [3]

    Dr. Gum'a added: "The hadith of Suhail bin Omar at Al-Hudaybiya says: 'Oh Lord, I was with Kisra [the ruler of Persia] and with Kaisar [the ruler of Byzantium] and I saw no instance in which the leader was glorified like the Companions of the Prophet glorified Muhammad. The second Muhammad spat, one of them would immediately hasten [to grab his saliva] and smear it upon his face.' Hence, the ulema, including Ibn Hajar Al-Askalani, Al-Baihaqi, Al-Daraqutni and Al-Haythami, determined that the Prophet's entire body was pure." [4]

    Several weeks later, the Egyptian press reported that Gum'a had apologized following objections to the fatwa voiced by the Academy of Islamic Research at Al-Azhar, and that he had promised, at the request of Al-Azhar Sheikh Muhammad Sayyed Tantawi, to have all copies of the book containing the fatwa taken off the market. [5] Later on, he explained that he had not apologized, but had only decided to refrain from appearing on the satellite television channels until the uproar died down. [6]

    Egyptian Religious Endowments Minister: Gum'a's Statements that the Prophet was Not Like Ordinary Humans are Against the Koran

    Egyptian Religious Endowments Minister Dr. Muhammad Hamdi Zaqzouq was extremely critical of Gum'a's statements. He said: "Fatwas such as these do damage to Islam, serve its enemies, and push the people towards backwardness and ignorance." [7] Writing in the government daily Al-Ahram, Zaqzouq explained further: "Tragic fatwas such as [Gum'a's] have harmed Islam and the Prophet more than the Danish cartoons did, because this time the harm comes not from Islam's enemies but from some Muslim ulema who present their opinions on Islam to the public...

    "The books of the hadiths contain both wheat and chaff. They contain the acceptable and the unacceptable, and it is not for the good of Islam or the Muslims if we repeatedly disseminate the pollution that they contain... Those of us who speak in the name of the religion must understand that... the world has changed, circumstances have changed, and it is no longer acceptable or logical to fill the heads of the Muslim masses with the defiled sayings, sick thoughts, and groundless suppositions whose correctness is completely unproven...

    "The publicity about [the Companions of the Prophet] blessing themselves by drinking the urine of the Prophet and spreading [his] saliva upon their faces does grave damage to the Prophet. No one disputes that the Prophet's was the supreme role-model in his traits and in his behavior... but Allah wanted him to be a [mortal] man, and for him to remain a mortal living among humans, to eat and drink like them, to marry and beget sons and daughters...

    "Thus, we do great damage to this preeminent figure if we remove him from the class of humans and [say]... that laws applying to everyone else do not apply to [his] corporeal secretions, and that it is possible to bless oneself with them and to make use of them - to the point of drinking his urine and smearing his saliva upon the face...

    "These hadiths cannot be accepted, either logically or from the point of view of shari'a. They cannot possibly be reliable, even if they were handed down in books and were related by those who handed down the hadiths. This is for the simple reason that [Gum'a's fatwa] goes against logic... The Koran stressed that the Prophet is human like us when it commanded: 'Say: I am only a mortal like you... [Koran 18: 110].'" [8]

    Al-Azhar: The Mufti's Analogy Was Mistaken

    The Academy for Islamic Research, headed by Al-Azhar Sheikh Dr. Muhammad Sayyed Tantawi, expressed vehement objections to the fatwa issued by Gum'a, who is an academy member. According to the academy, the fatwa was not appropriate for today's circumstances. It further determined that the tradition on which the fatwa was based did not actually recommend drinking the Prophet's urine, but was a retroactive acceptance of an instance in which the Prophet's urine was unintentionally imbibed. [9]

    In an article in the Egyptian daily Al-Ahram, academy member Dr. Abd Al-Mu'ti Bayoumi protested against Gum'a's fatwa: "[Gum'a's] defective conclusions clearly stem from his reliance on an isolated incident of unintentional [drinking of the Prophet's urine]. Qadhi Ayadh [bin Moussa Al-Yahsabi, editor of a collection of hadiths, d. 1149 CE] said in his book... that Umm Ayman was blessed when she drank [the Prophet's urine by accident] without knowing that it was urine, and that of the Messenger of Allah. She had absolutely no intention of blessing herself [with it].

    "Qadhi Ayadh said that Umm Ayman was the Prophet's servant, and that she had said: 'The Prophet had a wooden basin under his bed, for urinating in during the night. One night he urinated in it, and then [in the morning he] examined it and found nothing in it. He asked Baraka [Umm Ayman about] it, and she said, 'I woke up thirsty, and drank it unknowingly.' From this it must be concluded that... she did not intend to drink the urine of the Prophet in order to bless herself with it. It appears that the author of this fatwa [i.e. Gum'a] did not read this source, which he should have read..." [10]

    Gum'a Should Be Tried for Harming Islam, the Prophet, and the Companions of the Prophet

    Attorney Nabih Al-Wahsh filed a complaint against Gum'a with the prosecutor general, claiming that Gum'a's fatwa threatened social stability and also reviled and defamed the Prophet and his companions. [11] Al-Wahsh added that Gum'a's peculiar fatwa provided Islam's enemies with a golden opportunity to condemn Islam and its Prophet, and called for Gum'a to be tried on charges of reviling Islam and the companions of the Prophet, just as the state hastened to try anyone who defamed the Egyptian president. Al-Wahsh stressed that this fatwa was especially dangerous because it was issued by one of the ulema of Al-Azhar, which is the world's largest Sunni Muslim religious institution, and the public consequently believes every fatwa that comes out of it. [12]

    Gum'a Should Resign From His Post

    In his regular column in the government daily Al-Masaa, Muhsen Muhammad, former editor of the daily Al-Gumhouriyya, wrote that "the time has come for the honorable Mufti of Egypt Dr. Ali Gum'a to leave his post," either willingly or as a consequence of being discharged by the Egyptian Justice Ministry or by Al-Azhar. [13]

    Columnists: The Fatwa is Useless - Except to Islam's Enemies

    Al-Ahram editor Osama Saraya argued that Gum'a's fatwa was not relevant to Muslim life today, even if it did draw on religious sources: "The books of religious law contain many questions and issues, some of which have descended into oblivion. They have nothing to do with the reality of the lives of Muslims today, and they have become theoretical, philosophical or polemic [issues]. In the past, clerics said that one does not have to reveal everything one knows. The accepted opinion is that that many issues that preoccupied the Muslim clerics in the past are no longer worthy of discussion - either because they belong to the ancient period and are too loosely linked to public life, or because they are likely to cause confusion and public pandemonium. This is a fact well-known to students of religious law.

    "However, Al-Azhar cleric [Dr. Gum'a] has burrowed into the distant past in order to extract for us a fatwa that he wishes to publicize outside its context, and with a different meaning than [it originally had]..." [14]

    Gala Gaballah, columnist for the government daily Al-Gumhouriyya, wrote: "Whether the story of Umm Ayman is true or not, it should not be retold by the mufti. [If asked about it], the mufti should respond: 'What use is it to you to know this? The Prophet, with his honorable past, his honorable blood and his honorable urine, is no longer among us. There is no place at all for talking about such pointless matters, which are likely to harm people and start talk that will damage Islam and the religion...'

    "Our honorable [mufti] knows better than we that such fatwas [are meant] for the elite and not the masses - because there are those who lie in wait for Islam and try to harm our religion. These peculiar fatwas will... be used as a stick with which to beat Islam, or as a weapon with which to harm it, to try to destroy it, or at the very least to weaken it - at a time when the Islamic nation is [already] extremely weak..."


    Al-Gumhouriyya deputy editor Adel Al-Maghawiri wrote: "It appears that the honorable [mufti] found no [other] topic relevant to the [current] situation of Islam and the Muslims on which to issue a fatwa, and decided to issue this strange and provocative fatwa. I imagine that even the West - which draws vulgar pictures of Jesus and lives in an atmosphere of freedom and openness - would never accept this depiction [of the Prophet], which will [only] be exploited as new and fertile material for harming Him. Afterwards we will weep, rise up, and cry out over the rudeness of the Western press and its harm to the religion and the Prophet, when it is we [ourselves] who provide it with material by means of such fatwas..." [16]

    Al-Akhbar columnist Ahmad Ragab mocked Gum'a's statements, writing: "[With regard] to the fatwa of the honorable mufti... How is it possible to actually drink urine when this need is always met in a secluded place specially designated for this [purpose]? Did the Companions of the Prophet stand around and wait [there], with containers in their hands? Can any reasonable person imagine that the Prophet [actually] let them collect his urine?" [17]

    *L. Azuri is a research fellow at MEMRI.

    [1] Baraka Umm Ayman was a servant of the Prophet Muhammad as well as his nursemaid.

    [2] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt) May 20, 2007.

    [3] Umm Haram bint Milhan was a cousin of the prophet on his mother's side, and one of the first to embrace Islam and emigrate to Mecca.

    [4] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt) May 23, 2007. Dr. Gum'a made similar statements to the Egyptian weekly Al-Liwa Al-Islami, May 26, 2007.

    [5] Al-Gumhouriyya (Egypt), June 3, 2007; Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), June 4, 2007.

    [6] Al-Misriyoun (Egypt), June 9, 2007; Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt), June 10, 2007.

    [7] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt) May 22, 2007.

    [8] Al-Ahram (Egypt) May 29, 2007.

    [9] Al-Ahram (Egypt), June 3, 2007.

    [10] Al-Masri Al-Yawm (Egypt) May 30, 2007.

    [11] Egyptian attorney Nabih Al-Wahsh files frequent complaints on diverse issues. These have included a complaint against women's rights activist Dr. Nawal Al-Sa'adawi, claiming that her writings harmed the divine essence; a lawsuit against the interior minister demanding a change in the motto of the police force, which he claimed contravenes the Egyptian constitution; and a warning to the head of the Egyptian People's Council and to several MPs not to accept the presidential candidacy of Sa'd Al-Din Ibrahim, human rights activist and chairman of the Ibn Khaldoun Center in Cairo

    [12] Al-Misriyoun (Egypt) May 25, 2007.

    [13] Al-Masaa (Egypt), June 10, 2007.

    [14] Al-Ahram (Egypt) May 31, 2007.

    [15] Al-Gumhouriyya (Egypt) May 24, 2007.

    [16] Al-Gumhouriyya (Egypt) May 25, 2007.

    [17] Al-Akhbar (Egypt) May 21, 2007.
    Come visit O.W.M.V.com - no B's allowed -
    No Bullshit, Backstabbing or Better than you Attitudes

  3. #3
    Filthy mud blood GBA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005

    Default Re: How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?

    Chocolate Chirpie Chip Cookies

    2 1/4 cup flour
    1 tsp. baking soda
    1 tsp. salt
    1 cup butter, softened
    3/4 cup sugar
    3/4 cup brown sugar
    1 tsp. vanilla
    2 eggs
    1 12-ounce chocolate chips
    1 cup chopped nuts
    1/2 cup dry-roasted crickets

    Preheat oven to 375. In small bowl, combine flour, baking soda and salt; set aside. In large bowl, combine butter, sugar, brown sugar and vanilla; beat until creamy. Beat in eggs. Gradually add flour mixture and insects, mix well. Stir in chocolate chips. Drop by rounded measuring teaspoonfuls onto ungreased cookie sheet. Bake for 8-10 minutes.
    Come visit O.W.M.V.com - no B's allowed -
    No Bullshit, Backstabbing or Better than you Attitudes

  4. #4
    Filthy mud blood GBA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005

    Default Re: How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?

    Mealworm Fried Rice

    1 egg, beaten
    1 tsp. oil
    3/4 c. water
    1/4 c. chopped onions
    4 tsp. soy sauce
    1/8 tsp. garlic powder
    1 c. minute rice
    1 c. cooked mealworms
    Scramble egg in a saucepan, stirring to break egg into pieces.
    Add water, soy sauce, garlic and onions. Bring to a boil.

    Stir in rice. Cover; remove from heat and let stand five minutes.
    Come visit O.W.M.V.com - no B's allowed -
    No Bullshit, Backstabbing or Better than you Attitudes

  5. #5
    Wild Bill Mullet Head's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005

    Default Re: How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?

    I've seen Thai Bar ladies eating fried cockroaches, beatles, grasshoppers, locusts.
    Arab man is not to sit in bar and consume alcohol nor talk with lady

    We respect your belief in Islam

  6. #6
    I'm not banned pixikill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Eve knows

    Default Re: How Many Insect Parts and Rodent Hairs are Allowed in Your Food?

    i miss gba
    ...and THAT'S why they should legalise marijuana.

+ Reply to Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts