Well, there you have it. It took almost two years for someone to support my work and more importantly, the truth. I've had some support but I don't recall any poster who was a part of their community that offered the obviousness of it all. Greer was jfk's assassin because three films make it a fact. There is no doubt in my mind that if there's ever a real truth movement in this country it will lead with my JFK work, with or without my participation.Oh really, are deliberately denying that he was holding a gun not something it was clearly a GUN.
I am not talking about something here, why are you denying it, I need you to explain why are you trying to deny something that is blatantly obvious, I am looking clearly into his hand he turned around shot the president and stepped on the gas why are you trying to say it is not the case? LOL
Yes one shot was fired which lodged in his throat yes and many other shots were fired, But the SHOT came from the driver Not a shadow of a doubt.
and that video I posted with Bill Cooper explained it took him 16 years to get hold of it.
The driver did it and you know it too, because you can't possibly say I don't see anything in his hands, it's IMPOSSIBLE, unless you're deliberately denying it, for whatever reason.
This is now obvious, but it doesn't bother me you can deny all you want that's fine by me.
No he wasn't a little slow to respond, he slammed on the breaks mate, deliberately, the other thing, if that was truly the case, why were the two bodyguards who were riding at the back of the Limo were called back?
What difference would it make tell me, please explain this to me?
JFK was well in front, you agree with me?
So if the killer the real killer was somewhere on the grass like most people love this "Mysterious" theory because you can't point a finger at one person, a faceless killer again.
Would the bodyguards be able to stop a bullet from a sniper???
So why were they called back??
Just before the shooting started?
Because they knew who was going to deliver the fatal blow, and they know who the killer is, so the two bodyguards won't be able to identify him.
And I don't need other pieces of evidence, the film screams at you, and if you're telling me, the driver did not turn around with a gun in his hand, and he didn't turn back until he fired that shot and ONLY then he turned around again and stepped on the gas.
From that angle? It was not at all impossible as a matter of fact it is a very good angle to blow someone's head off sitting behind you on your right hand side and the Limo is wide, JFK was slightly leaning forward, Jackie didn't NOT pull him towards her, she moved towards him.
You don't believe me? Check the video again as many times as required you will see, the GUN in his hand, look where Jackie was sitting, and see how the driver turned around and then he pretended to accelerate.
There's nothing blatantly not true here, if he ducked nobody could have had a direct hit, he was shot first in the throat.
Yes many shots were fired I never said there was only the driver, but the shot that blew his wide open, was from the driver.
You will not convince me, unless you show me something substantial that can completely debunk that video, unless you can prove to me that this video is fixed, unless you can show me something completely solid up until now mate with all due respect, you stating your opinion, and I am posting evidence here, I didn't speak from my own opinion.
When I thought Jackie could have done it, I said she could have done it, but when I found out I was wrong, I admit I was wrong although I never said "Definitely" I said "She could have"
No laser eyes, there is a hand gun pointed at the president, and he SHOT HIM, then he turned around and stepped ON THE GAS.
Like I said, many shots were fired while people looking all over the place, where the shots were coming from, it was an opportunity for him to strike then, until he saw the president was struggling holding his throat, only then he turned around and blew his brains out.
You think it's impossible? Ok Take your friend in a car in an quite street pretend you have a gun in your hands drive the car see if the breaks won't come off, do you think it's that difficult?
Just one question, Why can't you accept it, what is it that is antagonising you about this?
It is clear are you seriously telling me that you can't see nothing in his hands??
I don't care about entertaining, I am looking for the truth, and the driver DID, unless you can prove to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that he didn't shoot him, I am sorry all you're saying is "What you think" and it's not good enough., and I don't care if thousands or even millions of people don't believe, I only believe the truth, truth can stand alone, a lie needs fabricated evidence.
Wrong!! He wouldn't have heard the shot it didn't come from Kennedy's head
The shot he would have heard from somewhere else, he turned AROUND and SHOT HIM, end of story, now you can go on and believe what you, this is ridiculous because I swear to God I know that you could see the same thing as I was looking at, but you decided not to accept it, because somehow it hurts you ego or something.
You have to have a final word or something stupid like that, sorry mate you don't sound like you're interested in any truth.
What would convince you that he did it? Tell me give me an example
if something that would convince you??
I can turn my head sufficiently and slightly my shoulder at an angle and deliver the blow, and you can do it, you're asking these questions, because you know we are debating on a forum I can't possibly show you here can I??
He was going at about 20 mph roughly, but the car nearly stopped when he delivered that shot that is a huge difference, for few seconds, all he needed is about 10 to 15 seconds to do the job, Do you think he is going to stop the car, turn completely around put the barrel on JFK's forehead and then pull the trigger, once it's done he would say now I can turn around again and drive at top speed?
What are you talking about? This guys are trained to kill to shoot from all angles and to tell you the truth, from that angle you can do it and I can do it.
You're making it look as an awkward angle, Well it is NOT!!!
And there was a GUN in his hand he turned around shot him and then he sped up.
It is not "MY" theory, sorry, This is a fact I am looking at the video, you are looking at it and then you tell me Oh I don't see nothing in the driver's hand??? This is ridiculous really.
Have you checked the video or are you just assuming that he had nothing in his hands?
That is exactly what the conspirators did, they expect you to act that way and to think that way.
What people he had JFK right where he wanted him and all of those in the car were involved.
Except maybe Jackie to which I have no proof that she was an accomplice
Ridiculous?? Ok why don't you give us an alternative and then maybe I will look at it instead of telling me this is ridiculous and that is impossible and so on??
What is your "Theory" then? Although I did say this is not my theory, You have the video, you're looking at it, and yet you deny that the driver didn't have anything in his hands??? LOLL come on this is ridiculous.
You might as well accept the warren's report in that case.
anyway this whole thing is ridiculous because some people's ego won't let them see, or simply and deliberately trying to distort the truth anyway.
The truth is looking at you in the face... carry on mate and carry on denying
Even if I brought a video of Greer saying yes I did the shooting you would deny it. I am sure!!
Enough of this ****.
Greer passes the covered object in Zapruder before the shot and that object is seen after the shot in frame 319. That bleached object is the gun they couldn't take out of Zapruder. Check the frames for confirmation. The fake reflection falls off his head in 318 and I think they did that to distract from the gun in 319. A reflection would disappear not fall off a head.