PDA

View Full Version : Yes Virginia, He's Screwed Up More Than Just Iraq



knightroar
06-18-2005, 02:15 PM
Yes Virginia,
He's Screwed Up More Than Just Iraq


Occasionally when someone yells, “fire!” in crowded theater, it’s because there really is a fire. So...........

Fire!


The US economy is on fire. No, I’m not talking about a new bull market in stocks or real estate. I mean the damn thing is on f-i-r-e. You might not have noticed because it’s smoldering just under the surface, like a peat fire. But it’s heading for a stand of tinder-dry woodlands, and when it hits it’ll be too late to get out.

Those woodlands are the sprawling forest of US homes now financed by risky new adjustable rate and interest-only mortgages. The frenzy to loan money to spendthrift and borrow Americans has become so lucrative for lenders that they have shucked their stiff old green eyeshades and banker’s sobriety and become the lender-equivalents of used car dealers. You’ve seen the Ditech and e-Loan ads. Some would make a local yokel used car dealer blush.


“Are we CaaaaaaaaaRAZY? Go ahead, call us CRAZY. But come in today and buy your new home with a loan from Grabit and Dash Mortgage. NO. NO. NO, I SAID NO MONEY DOWN. But wait! There’s more. NO PRINCIPAL PAYMENTS FOR FIVE.. FIVE.. YES! I SAID FIVE, FIVE, FIVE years.”


And of course, it’s worked. Millions of Americans, many who never would have qualified for a home loan have. The trouble is a lot of these folks would have been politely, but firmly, escorted to the sidewalk a bank security guard just a few short years ago – for their own good, and the bank’s.

I'm a bloodied veteran taxpayer of the savings and loan scandal. So I get a little twitchy when I see institutions, whose chits I might have to cover someday, get loosey-goosey with their lending practices. I remember back in the mid-1980s when another cowboy, Ronald Reagan, was in the White House and supply-siders were pumping nitrous oxide through the national ventilation system. Asset values, they assured us, would go up. So, stop clinging to old-banker bromides, especially those girlie-boy “loan-to-value”rules. If a lender lends 110% of a property’s current value, what’s the problem? In a month or two and the loan will be more than covered by natural property value inflation. And, if problems do develop, the nation will “grow” its way out of it, they said. How? Well by exploiting new “synergies” created by the dynamics of a deregulated banking sector, they assured

Of course it didn’t work quite that way and cost US taxpayers $164 billion to cover those bad loans. (Tip: When you hear someone proposing a loosening of laws regulating the use of other people’s money on the grounds that the changes will create new “synergies,” -- just call the police.)

But memory fades. Today another cowboy is in the saddle and the game is once again afoot. Another prairie fire is about to be set. And here’s the match.

Over the next two years the contractual 5-year “adjustment” on those loans will be triggered. For the first five years borrowers were allowed to make artificially low monthly payments, allowing a lot of people who did not earn enough to afford a $400,000 home to qualify for a loan to buy one. Neither those borrowers or their lenders worried about what was going to happen in five years when their monthly payment jumped from $1500 a month to $2,500 a month. Maybe they would get a $250-a-week raise at work by then. Or, maybe they would sell the house for more. And, if they default, well, the house may be worth more by then to more than cover the lender. Lots of maybe's there that in the past would have had no place in the underwriting process -- and still shouldn't.

But there’s no maybe about this. This is a hard fact. In 2007 lenders will trigger ARM adjustments on more than $1 trillion of the nation's mortgage debt - or about 12 percent of outstanding mortgage debt. That will add over $40 billion in additional monthly payments for those homeowner/borrowers. Yes, $40 billion more. Call me CRAZY, but that sure smells like smoke to me.

Nevertheless, this problem continues to grow. This year lenders report that 40% of the mortgage and refi loans they made were ARMs. As rates begin to go up this year and next, expect that percentage to jump. That’s because the loan-'em-all-they-want feeding frenzy of the past five years has created a glut of lenders. As rates go up it will force consolidation and fierce competition. Expect all kinds of TV teaser rate mortgage ads touting, “low-down, no-down, low-fee, no-fee, low-documentation, no-documentation, approval-on-line, you-don’t-even-need-to-prove-you’re-alive,” loan offers.

All this is particularly disturbing when you recall that the only thing that’s been holding this hollow economy together for the past four years has been the housing market. Automakers, airlines, textile manufacturers, manufacturers in general, are all just trying make it to the next fiscal year without filing for bankruptcy protection. If housing goes into the shitter, everything else follows.

But don’t expect an early warning call from Alan Greenspan, or anyone from Washington, Wall Street or the US Chamber of Commerce. Because those guys hate it when someone yells “fire,” in their theater. It can result in a rush to the exit, and that could leave “stake holders” holding the bag -- and that’s no fun.

Instead they like to engineer what they call “a soft landing.” Sounds nice.. ummm-a soft landing. Of course what they really mean that is they like to beat the rush, to have time to slip quietly from the theater while the rest of us are still absorbed in the movie -- and before we notice the smoke.

So expect Alan and his friends to continue making soothing remarks like, “While there is some froth in the real estate markets in isolated regions, we expect no large scale decline in real estate values nationwide,” and “While long term rates continue low, for reasons we cannot explain, and there appears to be continuing weakness in the manufacturing sector, the economy on a whole remains on firm footing.”

But here’s a tip from a guy who got caught in the last theater-fire: Keep one eye peeled for guys in suits leaving their seats.You might not notice them because they will just stroll up the darkened aisle as though going to the lobby for a popcorn refill.

Follow those guys.

http://www.newsforreal.com/

Shinywalrus
06-18-2005, 07:07 PM
It's not "loosey-goosey." Financial institutions are finally able to take advantage of database and computing technology to develop accurate early paydown, bankruptcy and default models. The ability to unveil products that have distinctive characteristics like this in most cases represents an aknowledgment of a specific behavior that has manifested itself in such a way that the product is very likely to be profitable.

This entire article is wishy-washy, though. The guy tries to come off like a sage, but he ends up wandering around without ever making or substantiating any point.

Moreover, he tries to pin our economy "burning down" to a specific banking product that is very limited in scope and offering? Please, this is exactly the kind of exaggerative nonsense we should be avoiding. Shame on you for bringing this in here, KR.

Bman
03-26-2007, 02:19 PM
KR tried to warn you all, almost two years ago... and of course the only reply was a naysayer offering up the standard, "OH NO.. THIS TIME ITS DIFFERENT... OUR 'MODELS' are better.. blah blah blah"

So, where are we now... almost two years later?

The Loans are going bust.. JUST AS PREDICTED..

There's no such thing as a FREE LUNCH, folks. When someone offers you one, based on a "new model" or a "new efficiency" , run for the hills... lest you end up buried in them



Posted on Mon, Mar. 26, 2007

SUBPRIME LOANS BACKFIRE ON BORROWERS

By ALEX VEIGA
Associated Press

LOS ANGELES - A divorce led Daniel Peart to refinance his four-bedroom home with a subprime loan.

Like many borrowers with spotty credit, the self-employed handyman said he agreed to a relatively high interest rate in exchange for two years of low, fixed payments.

In less than a year, however, the payments jumped beyond his budget, forcing him to seek bankruptcy protection while trying to sell the home he bought 19 years ago, he said.

''I put the majority of the blame on the broker, for not being upfront, telling me what the charges were all going to be, and rapid-signing all the paperwork,'' said Peart, 53, whose home is located in the San Diego suburb of Poway.

Peart is not alone in his claims. Many bankrupt homebuyers are now pointing the finger at subprime lenders, claiming they approved mortgages for people who couldn't afford them to keep loan volumes high as the housing market slowed.

Some analysts cite those tactics for the subprime meltdown that has seen several lenders seek bankruptcy protection amid rising default rates.

''Both lenders and brokers had a string of incentives to keep their volumes up, even as market conditions tightened, and the way that they could do that is by lowering their qualification standards,'' said Paul Leonard, director of the California office of the Center for Responsible Lending.

''There's plenty of blame to go around,'' he said.

Doug Duncan, chief economist for the Mortgage Bankers Association in Washington, D.C., acknowledged that, in some cases, aggressive lenders obscured facts and made loans that borrowers couldn't afford.

''Most of those companies are closing their doors,'' Duncan said, adding that so far this year, 27 companies have gone out of business because they made bad loans.

Still, experts say borrowers could share some of the responsibility. Many jumped too quickly at the lure of low initial mortgage payments without fully considering the impact of higher interest rates and account balances in the years ahead.

It was their responsibility to fully understand the terms of their loans, said Nick Larson, an assistant vice president at the Mortgage Asset Research Institute.

Subprime lenders thrived during the real estate boom, when appreciation rates soared and equity protected most homebuyers from defaulting on their loans. Most could simply refinance or sell homes at a big enough profit to pay off mortgages and move on.

Investment banks also jumped in, eager to buy loans from subprime lenders then slice them up into bond products to sell on Wall Street.

Brokers and lenders promoted the loans as a way for would-be homebuyers to get into the market with low initial payments.

The loans were touted as a way for people who already owned homes to unlock equity. It wasn't unusual to see mailers offering refinancing deals at initial rates of 1 percent or less.

About 50 percent of the subprime mortgages were ''stated income loans,'' with no verification of borrowers' incomes, Leonard said.

Such loans speed the approval process but carry risks of abuse.

Last year, the Mortgage Asset Research Institute sampled 100 such loan applications and reported that 90 percent listed significantly higher incomes for borrowers than they had reported on their tax returns.


http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/16974488.htm

Bman
03-26-2007, 02:20 PM
It's not "loosey-goosey." Financial institutions are finally able to take advantage of database and computing technology to develop accurate early paydown, bankruptcy and default models. The ability to unveil products that have distinctive characteristics like this in most cases represents an aknowledgment of a specific behavior that has manifested itself in such a way that the product is very likely to be profitable. .




:add09: :add09:


http://www.sdbj.com/industry_article.asp?aID=51947749.5238108.1448785. 2966517.8857828.832&aID2=111436


Posted date: 3/19/2007

Shares in Troubled Subprime Mortgage Industry Take a Beating

Bankruptcy Court OKs Sale of AMS to Rival in Southeast
By MIKE ALLEN

San Diego Business Journal Staff

The free fall in the market value of companies in the subprime home loan industry continued last week after New Century Financial Corp. of Irvine said two lenders, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America, had cut off financing.

The news put a temporary halt on trading in New Century shares, but not before the stock price plummeted to $1.30 on March 12. The following day, the company said its stock was being delisted from the New York Stock Exchange and moved to the Pink Sheets, declining to below $1. In February, New Century shares were trading above $30.

Other subprime lender shares were also battered last week.

San Diego-based Accredited Home Lenders fell by 28 percent to $11.40, then dropped 42 percent March 13 when it said it wouldn’t file audited year-end results on time.

Other subpimes also lost ground last week. NovaStar Financial dropped 19 percent to $4.24; and Fremont General Corp. declined 16 percent to $6.73 on March 12.

Rich Eckert, senior research analyst with Roth Capital Partners in Irvine, said many investors are exiting the subprime space, which has seen an industrywide decline by a surge of delinquent payments.

Accredited’s shares fell below $7 on March 13 after it said it would not make the deadline on filing its 10K report with regulators. It also announced it was “exploring strategic options” involving boosting its liquidity or cash. Accredited said its credit providers made margin calls on existing agreements that resulted in repaying $190 million since Jan. 1.

Cartman
03-26-2007, 02:23 PM
KR tried to warn you all, almost two years ago... and of course the only reply was a naysayer offering up the standard, "OH NO.. THIS TIME ITS DIFFERENT... OUR 'MODELS' are better.. blah blah blah"

So, where are we now... almost two years later?

The Loans are going bust.. JUST AS PREDICTED..

There's no such thing as a FREE LUNCH, folks. When someone offers you one, based on a "new model" or a "new efficiency" , run for the hills... lest you end up buried in them.
Maybe so, but how is any of this anybody in DC's fault, or something that they (aside from nationalizing and abolishing the Fed) need to "fix"??

Bman
03-26-2007, 02:29 PM
Maybe so, but how is any of this anybody in DC's fault, or something that they (aside from nationalizing and abolishing the Fed) need to "fix"??


who's calling for a fix??

Not me...


As far as "who's fault".. you're right.. its Greenspan and the Congress, whom he answers to... Once again... a lack of oversight from Congress .


I have no idea what Greenspan was smoking when he was pumping ARMs back in 2004


The New York Post

July 22, 2004 Thursday

DON'T ASK GREENSPAN FOR ADVICE ON WHAT MORTGAGE TO GET

John Crudele


ALAN Greenspan's opinions appear to be very adjustable.

Just look at how the Federal Reserve Board chairman's take on adjustable rate mortgages has changed.

In February Greenspan said, "American consumers might benefit if lenders provided greater mortgage-product alternatives to the fixed rate mortgage."

That statement was widely interpreted as a big, fat wet kiss for adjustable rate mortgages.

In May this column noted that anyone who took Greenspan's advice would be facing huge future risk, especially since the Fed chairman himself was not-so-subtly warning at the time that interest rates were going higher.

Now for the latest.

In testimony this week before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, Greenspan explained that his positive view of the economy was partially based on the fact that "very large fractions of the total outstanding obligations of businesses and household are long-term, fixed-rate debt."

Lucky people didn't listen to Greenspan when he was hot for adjustable loans.

The headline of Greenspan's testimony this week was that he again promised to fight inflation with more rate hikes. That's another statement he will probably wish he didn't make.

This week brought more signs that economic growth is slowing. Housing starts and new permits for future construction were significantly weaker than expected for June. Industrial production, retail sales and car sales are also flopping.

And inflation? The number that Greenspan follows closely, the Personal Consumer Expenditures, is growing at a worrisome annual rate of 3.2 percent, up from just 1.0 percent in 2003's fourth quarter.

The way I see it, a slowdown in the economy trumps inflation in importance during a presidential election year.

No matter what he says now, Greenspan will be very wary of raising rates again over the next three months - even if inflation becomes awful.

* Dick Grasso now has two very big and dangerous bets on the table in his poker game against Eliot Spitzer and The New York Stock Exchange.

This week the former head of the NYSE sued John Reed, the new leader of the exchange and the Big Board itself, for various reasons including defamation of character.

Legal sources tell me the defamation claim is particularly dangerous for Grasso because it will bring his character and entire life into question during the trial.

That would be OK except that the NYSE had two big scandals during Grasso's tenure - one into which he was almost dragged.

So Grasso's side may eventually regret complaining about being called bad names.

In another development this week Spitzer asked that his suit against Grasso be moved back into New York State court where it was originally filed.

The case involves Grasso's compensation while at the NYSE.

Experts believe Grasso wants the case in federal court since a previous ruling gave him absolute immunity from suits because Grasso asserted that his role as a regulator gave him special status.

The irony is that immunity - if upheld - could be used to protect the millions Grasso was allowed to earn at the NYSE by claiming he was more than just a regulator.

One source that is very familiar with the immunity issue thinks the irony won't be lost on the federal court, which will bump the case back to the state level.

*

If the takeover of MGM were a horse race, here's the situation in the final furlong. * Time Warner is in the lead and moving quickly toward the finish line.

* After being out in front, Sony And its private equity partners are fading fast. You can also expect them to come up with some lame face-saver if a formal offer can't be structured.

* NBC has signed a non-disclosure agreement but has done little more. But while NBC is lagging far behind, sources it could be a very strong finisher - especially if it gets a partner.

Anyone handicapping this race should look at Tuesday's issue of Variety, which says Microsoft has appointed an executive named Brian Westlake to cozy up to Hollywood.

As I said here a couple weeks ago, Microsoft has been nosing around the entertainment industry in general and MGM in particular.

NBC could win the race if it gets Microsoft - already its partner in cable company MSNBC - to join it.

Please send e-mail to: jcrudele@nypost.com